Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7030, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $316 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 38/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is noticeably lighter (170g vs 309g).
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 170g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $316 vs $2899
- Better design/ergonomics (87/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (88/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 48/100)
Comparing the Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 19 points higher (57/100 vs 38/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo leads (88/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 40 Neo (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (49/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Edge 40 Neo are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100). In the "design" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (88/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Motorola Edge 40 Neo | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.5" P-OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 103 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 159.6×72.0×7.9 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 170 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $316 | $2899 |
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- 6.5" P-OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Price difference: $2583. Motorola Edge 40 Neo is cheaper by $2583.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 40 Neo (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (49/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Motorola Edge 40 Neo are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (88/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Motorola Edge 40 Neo or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 40 Neo and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a MobileRank rating of 38/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 40 Neo or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 44/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Edge 40 Neo or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Edge 40 Neo over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.