Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7030, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 57/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 765,130); the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is noticeably lighter (170g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Motorola Edge 40 Neo better?
- Faster charging: 68W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 170g vs 309g
- Better display (90/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (78/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 765130
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1043
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2472
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 53/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Motorola Edge 40 Neo vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 12 points higher (69/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 40 Neo (90/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Motorola Edge 40 Neo | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 765130 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1043 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2472 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.5" P-OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 68W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 103 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 13 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 159.6×72.0×7.9 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 170 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- 6.5" P-OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 68W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Motorola Edge 40 Neo and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Motorola Edge 40 Neo by 73.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 40 Neo (90/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (90/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 44/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (78/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Motorola Edge 40 Neo or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Motorola Edge 40 Neo and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Motorola Edge 40 Neo or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 44/100).
Which is more powerful: the Motorola Edge 40 Neo or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Motorola Edge 40 Neo over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.