Lava Blaze Dragon vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Lava Blaze Dragon (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $109 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 42/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 568,395); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Dragon doesn't; the Lava Blaze Dragon is noticeably lighter (210g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Dragon
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Lava Blaze Dragon better?
- Lighter: 210g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $109 vs $2899
- Better portability (41/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 568395
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 915
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2115
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Dragon vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 27 points higher (69/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 43/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Dragon — 70/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (90/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (52/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (63/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (41/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Dragon | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 568395 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 915 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2115 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 900x1600 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 450 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 168.2×77.8×9.1 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $109 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Dragon
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Dragon
- 6.8" LCD
- Resolution: 900x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Dragon
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Dragon and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Lava Blaze Dragon by 80.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2790. Lava Blaze Dragon was $2790 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (90/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 56/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (52/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (63/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Dragon notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (41/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon by 27 points (69/100 vs 42/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Dragon and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Lava Blaze Dragon has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Dragon over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.