Lava Blaze Dragon vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Lava Blaze Dragon (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 74/100 vs 42/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Dragon has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 568,395); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Dragon doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 9.1mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Dragon
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes Lava Blaze Dragon better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Overall rating 42/100
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 568395
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 915
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2115
- Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
- Lighter: 201g vs 210g
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 46/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 56/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 41/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Dragon vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 32 points higher (74/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 46/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (98/100 vs 46/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (80/100 vs 56/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (50/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (74/100 vs 41/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Dragon | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 568395 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 915 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2115 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" LCD | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 900x1600 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 450 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 168.2×77.8×9.1 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | $109 | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Dragon
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Dragon
- 6.8" LCD
- Resolution: 900x1600
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Dragon
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Dragon and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Lava Blaze Dragon by 85.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (98/100 vs 46/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (80/100 vs 56/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (50/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon (74/100 vs 41/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Dragon by 32 points (74/100 vs 42/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Dragon and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Lava Blaze Dragon has a MobileRank rating of 42/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Dragon or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 46/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Dragon over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.