Lava Blaze Curve vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Lava Blaze Curve (2024) runs on the Dimensity 7050, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 74/100 vs 54/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Curve has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 806,012); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Curve doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is thinner (4.5mm vs 8.8mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Curve
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes Lava Blaze Curve better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 189g vs 201g
- Overall rating 54/100
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 806012
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2398
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 48/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 79/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Curve vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 20 points higher (74/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Curve (98/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Lava Blaze Curve are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Lava Blaze Curve are nearly equal (50/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Curve (74/100 vs 57/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Curve | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7050 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 806012 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2398 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×74.0×8.8 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Curve
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Curve
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Curve
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Curve and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Lava Blaze Curve by 79.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Curve (98/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Lava Blaze Curve are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Lava Blaze Curve are nearly equal (50/100 vs 48/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Curve (74/100 vs 57/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Curve by 20 points (74/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Curve and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Lava Blaze Curve has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Curve over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.