Lava Blaze Curve vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
The Lava Blaze Curve (2024) runs on the Dimensity 7050, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads — 75/100 vs 54/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Curve has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 806,012); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Curve doesn't; the Lava Blaze Curve is noticeably lighter (189g vs 215g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Curve
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
What makes Lava Blaze Curve better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4400 mAh
- Faster charging: 33W vs 25W
- Lighter: 189g vs 215g
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 39/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 78/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 806012
- Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 2398
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (76/100 vs 48/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 57/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Curve vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 scores 21 points higher (75/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (91/100 vs 53/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (76/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Curve (91/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Curve and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Curve (76/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 57/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Curve | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7050 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 806012 | 3065623 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 2910 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2398 | 9174 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2184x1968 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4400 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 25W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 145 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×74.0×8.8 mm | 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 215 g | |
| Launch price | — | $1999 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Curve
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Curve
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2184x1968
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Curve
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7
- 4400 mAh
- Wired: 25W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Curve and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads Lava Blaze Curve by 73.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Lava Blaze Curve
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Curve (91/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Curve and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Curve (76/100 vs 48/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 57/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Curve by 21 points (75/100 vs 54/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Curve and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Lava Blaze Curve has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 — 75/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 48/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on performance (91/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Curve over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.