Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 74/100 vs 50/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 693,978); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 201g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 174g vs 201g
- Better portability (79/100 vs 74/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2386
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (50/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (80/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 24 points higher (74/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (98/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (98/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (50/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 74/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1828x2448 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4800 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 17 / One UI 9 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 3000 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 161.4×123.9×4.5 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 201 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 1828x2448
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 82.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (98/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (80/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (50/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (52/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a bit better (79/100 vs 74/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 24 points (74/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (98/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.