Lava Play Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide

The Lava Play Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads — 71/100 vs 53/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Play Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 877,641); the Lava Play Ultra is noticeably lighter (182g vs 199g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably better than the Lava Play Ultra — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Play Ultra
Performance 55
Display 79
Camera 39
Battery 46
Portability 71
Value for money 76
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Performance 92
Display 81
Camera 50
Battery 45
Portability 76
Value for money
What makes Lava Play Ultra better?
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 182g vs 199g

  • Longer battery life (46/100 vs 45/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 877641
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2813
  • Faster charging: 45W vs 33W

  • Higher performance (92/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (50/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
  • Better portability (76/100 vs 71/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Play Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide scores 18 points higher (71/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads (50/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Lava Play Ultra (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Lava Play Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (50/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Play Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (46/100 vs 45/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (76/100 vs 71/100).

Lava Play Ultra: The Lava Play Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Specs comparison
Specification Lava Play Ultra Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 877641 3119308
Geekbench Single 1011 3041
Geekbench Multi 2813 9494
Display 6.7" AMOLED 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
Resolution 1080x2400 1828x2584
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 4800 mAh
Charging 33W 45W
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 10 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 16, up to 7 major Android upgrades, One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP48
Dimensions 162.1×75.4×7.8 mm 161.4×123.9×4.9 mm
Weight 182 g 199 g
Launch price $175
Camera comparison
Lava Play Ultra
  • Main: 64MP
  • Front: 13MP
39
camera
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • Main: 50MP
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Front: 10MP
50
camera
Display comparison
Lava Play Ultra
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • 7.6" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2
  • Resolution: 1828x2584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Lava Play Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
  • 4800 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
45
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Lava Play Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Play Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 7300
53/100
877641 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
71/100 +71.9%
3119308 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads Lava Play Ultra by 71.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Lava Play Ultra
$175
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide significantly outperforms the Lava Play Ultra (92/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide and the Lava Play Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (50/100 vs 39/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Lava Play Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide are nearly equal (46/100 vs 45/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a bit better (76/100 vs 71/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Play Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is noticeably better than the Lava Play Ultra — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Lava Play Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Lava Play Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Play Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on camera score (50/100 vs 39/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Play Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide leads on performance (92/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Lava Play Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide?

The Lava Play Ultra is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Wide is a better fit for gamers and power users.