Lava Blaze Curve vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Lava Blaze Curve (2024) runs on the Dimensity 7050, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 54/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 806,012); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Curve doesn't; the Lava Blaze Curve is noticeably lighter (189g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Curve
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Lava Blaze Curve better?
- Lighter: 189g vs 309g
- Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (57/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 806012
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2398
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 53/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 48/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Curve vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 15 points higher (69/100 vs 54/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 53/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Curve (90/100 vs 53/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Lava Blaze Curve are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Curve (63/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Curve significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (57/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Curve | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7050 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 806012 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2398 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.8×74.0×8.8 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | — | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Curve
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Curve
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Curve
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Curve and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Lava Blaze Curve by 72.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Lava Blaze Curve
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Curve (90/100 vs 53/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Curve is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Lava Blaze Curve are nearly equal (52/100 vs 48/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Curve (63/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Curve significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (57/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Lava Blaze Curve — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Curve and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Lava Blaze Curve has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 53/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Curve over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.