Lava Virat Curve 5G vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

The Lava Virat Curve 5G (2026) runs on the Dimensity 7100, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 52/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Virat Curve 5G has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 785,352).

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Lava Virat Curve 5G — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Virat Curve 5G

Performance 54
Display 79
Camera 31
Battery 56
Portability —
Value for money —

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

Performance 90
Display 70
Camera 52
Battery 63
Portability 20
Value for money 46

What makes Lava Virat Curve 5G better?

  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh

  • Better display (79/100 vs 70/100)

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 785352
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 995
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 2925
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (90/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better camera (52/100 vs 31/100)
  • Longer battery life (63/100 vs 56/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Virat Curve 5G vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 17 points higher (69/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 31/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Lava Virat Curve 5G (90/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Virat Curve 5G is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Lava Virat Curve 5G (52/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 56/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold: The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Virat Curve 5G Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Processor Dimensity 7100 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
AnTuTu 785352 2926532
Geekbench Single 995 3013
Geekbench Multi 2925 9287
Display 6.7" AMOLED 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
Resolution 1080x2400 2160x1584
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 5600 mAh
Charging 45W 45W
Wireless charging 0W 15W
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 10 MP
Front camera 13 MP 10 MP
RAM 6GB 16GB
Storage 128GB 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 16 / One UI 8
Brightness (peak) 1100 nits 2600 nits
NFC — yes
Protection IP64 IP48
Dimensions — 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm
Weight — 309 g
Launch price — $2899

Camera comparison

Lava Virat Curve 5G

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 13MP
31
camera

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
52
camera

Display comparison

Lava Virat Curve 5G

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2160x1584
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
70
display

Battery and charging

Lava Virat Curve 5G

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

  • 5600 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless: 15W
63
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Virat Curve 5G and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Virat Curve 5G Dimensity 7100
52/100
785352 AnTuTu
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
69/100 +73.2%
2926532 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Lava Virat Curve 5G by 73.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Virat Curve 5G

Price unknown

Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold

$2899

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Lava Virat Curve 5G (90/100 vs 54/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Virat Curve 5G is a bit better (79/100 vs 70/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Lava Virat Curve 5G (52/100 vs 31/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 56/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Virat Curve 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Lava Virat Curve 5G — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Lava Virat Curve 5G and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Lava Virat Curve 5G has a MobileRank rating of 52/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Virat Curve 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 31/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Virat Curve 5G or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 54/100).

Should you choose the Lava Virat Curve 5G over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?

The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.