Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Poco C65
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85; launch prices were $139 and $99. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads — 50/100 vs 33/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is faster in AnTuTu (693,978 vs 348,562); the Poco C65 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 192g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Poco C65
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 693978 vs 348562
- Better Geekbench Single: 1037 vs 375
- Better Geekbench Multi: 2386 vs 1031
- Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Lighter: 174g vs 192g
- Higher performance (51/100 vs 25/100)
- Longer battery life (46/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (79/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (79/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Poco C65 better?
- Cheaper at launch: $99 vs $139
- Overall rating 33/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Poco C65, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 scores 17 points higher (50/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads (51/100 vs 25/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Poco C65 — 56/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (51/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (79/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100. In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (79/100 vs 63/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Poco C65 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | MediaTek Helio G85 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 348562 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 375 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 1031 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1600x720 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 13 / HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 192 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | $99 |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Poco C65
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco C65
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Poco C65
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Poco C65, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads Poco C65 by 99.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $40. Poco C65 was $40 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (51/100 vs 25/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (79/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 30/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 notably outperforms the Poco C65 (79/100 vs 63/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Poco C65?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably better than the Poco C65 — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Poco C65?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Poco C65 — 33/100.
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Poco C65?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 leads on performance (51/100 vs 25/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Poco C65?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.