Lava Blaze Curve vs Poco C65

The Lava Blaze Curve (2024) runs on the Dimensity 7050, while the Poco C65 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85. By overall MobileRank rating, the Lava Blaze Curve leads — 54/100 vs 33/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Lava Blaze Curve is faster in AnTuTu (806,012 vs 348,562); the Poco C65 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Curve doesn't.

The Lava Blaze Curve significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 21 points (54/100 vs 33/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Curve

Performance 53
Display 79
Camera 48
Battery 46
Portability 57
Value for money —

Poco C65

Performance 25
Display 43
Camera 30
Battery 43
Portability 63
Value for money 56

What makes Lava Blaze Curve better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 806012 vs 348562
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1061 vs 375
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 2398 vs 1031
  • Faster charging: 33W vs 18W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
  • Lighter: 189g vs 192g

  • Higher performance (53/100 vs 25/100)
  • Better camera (48/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (46/100 vs 43/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 43/100)

What makes Poco C65 better?


  • Better portability (63/100 vs 57/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Curve vs the Poco C65, the Lava Blaze Curve scores 21 points higher (54/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Curve leads (53/100 vs 25/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Curve leads (48/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Curve notably outperforms the Poco C65 (53/100 vs 25/100). In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Curve significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (79/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Curve notably outperforms the Poco C65 (48/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Curve and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (63/100 vs 57/100).

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Curve Poco C65
Processor Dimensity 7050 MediaTek Helio G85
AnTuTu 806012 348562
Geekbench Single 1061 375
Geekbench Multi 2398 1031
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.7" IPS LCD
Resolution 1080x2400 1600x720
Refresh rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 33W 18W
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 8 MP
RAM 8GB 4GB / 6GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 13 Android 13 / HyperOS
Brightness (peak) 800 nits 600 nits
NFC no yes
Dimensions 161.8×74.0×8.8 mm 168.0×78.0×8.1 mm
Weight 189 g 192 g
Launch price — $99

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Curve

  • Main: 64MP
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 32MP
48
camera

Poco C65

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Curve

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Poco C65

  • 6.7" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1600x720
  • Refresh rate: 90 Hz
43
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Curve

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Poco C65

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 18W
  • No wireless charging
43
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Curve and Poco C65, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Curve Dimensity 7050
54/100
806012 AnTuTu
Poco C65 MediaTek Helio G85
33/100 -131.2%
348562 AnTuTu

Lava Blaze Curve leads Poco C65 by 131.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Curve

Price unknown

Poco C65

$99

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Lava Blaze Curve notably outperforms the Poco C65 (53/100 vs 25/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Lava Blaze Curve significantly outperforms the Poco C65 (79/100 vs 43/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Lava Blaze Curve notably outperforms the Poco C65 (48/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Lava Blaze Curve and the Poco C65 are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Poco C65 is a bit better (63/100 vs 57/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Poco C65?

The Lava Blaze Curve significantly outperforms the Poco C65 by 21 points (54/100 vs 33/100).

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Curve and the Poco C65?

The Lava Blaze Curve has a MobileRank rating of 54/100, the Poco C65 — 33/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Poco C65?

The Lava Blaze Curve leads on camera score (48/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Curve or the Poco C65?

The Lava Blaze Curve leads on performance (53/100 vs 25/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Curve over the Poco C65?

Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is display — better on the Lava Blaze Curve (79/100 vs 43/100).