Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Poco F9 Ultra
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Poco F9 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F9 Ultra leads — 90/100 vs 50/100 (a 40-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F9 Ultra has the bigger battery (8050 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Poco F9 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,165,108 vs 693,978); the Poco F9 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 238g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
Poco F9 Ultra
What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?
- Lighter: 174g vs 238g
- Better portability (79/100 vs 31/100)
What makes Poco F9 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4165108 vs 693978
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1037
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2386
- Bigger battery: 8050 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 185Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 51/100)
- Better camera (90/100 vs 30/100)
- Longer battery life (91/100 vs 46/100)
- Better display (91/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Poco F9 Ultra, the Poco F9 Ultra scores 40 points higher (90/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Ultra leads (98/100 vs 51/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Ultra leads (90/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Ultra leads (91/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (98/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (90/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (91/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Poco F9 Ultra (79/100 vs 31/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Lava Blaze Amoled 2 | Poco F9 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7060 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 693978 | 4165108 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1037 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2386 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.9" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 185 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 8050 mAh | |
| Charging | 33W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16, HyperOS 3 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 800 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm | 163.5×78.0×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 174 g | 238 g | |
| Launch price | $139 | — |
Camera comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 8MP
Poco F9 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Poco F9 Ultra
- 6.9" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 185 Hz
Battery and charging
Lava Blaze Amoled 2
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Poco F9 Ultra
- 8050 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Poco F9 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Poco F9 Ultra leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 83.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Poco F9 Ultra
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (98/100 vs 51/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Poco F9 Ultra is a bit better (91/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (90/100 vs 30/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (91/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Poco F9 Ultra (79/100 vs 31/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Poco F9 Ultra significantly outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 40 points (90/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Poco F9 Ultra — 90/100.
Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Poco F9 Ultra leads on camera score (90/100 vs 30/100).
Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Poco F9 Ultra leads on performance (98/100 vs 51/100).
Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Poco F9 Ultra?
The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Poco F9 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.