Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs Poco F7

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7060, while the Poco F7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4; launch prices were $139 and $399. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F7 leads — 66/100 vs 50/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F7 has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the Poco F7 is faster in AnTuTu (2,199,079 vs 693,978); the Poco F7 has NFC for contactless payments, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 doesn't; the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is noticeably lighter (174g vs 215g).

The Poco F7 is noticeably better than the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

Performance 51
Display 79
Camera 30
Battery 46
Portability 79
Value for money 78

Poco F7

Performance 80
Display 83
Camera 37
Battery 68
Portability 48
Value for money 60

What makes Lava Blaze Amoled 2 better?

  • Lighter: 174g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $139 vs $399

  • Better portability (79/100 vs 48/100)

What makes Poco F7 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 2199079 vs 693978
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2072 vs 1037
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 6649 vs 2386
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 33W

  • Higher performance (80/100 vs 51/100)
  • Better camera (37/100 vs 30/100)
  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 46/100)
  • Better display (83/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 vs the Poco F7, the Poco F7 scores 16 points higher (66/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 leads (80/100 vs 51/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 leads (68/100 vs 46/100). Value score: Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — 78/100, Poco F7 — 60/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (80/100 vs 51/100). In the "display" category, the Poco F7 and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (83/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (68/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (79/100 vs 48/100).

Lava Blaze Amoled 2: The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Poco F7: The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.

Specs comparison

Specification Lava Blaze Amoled 2 Poco F7
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 7060 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
AnTuTu 693978 2199079
Geekbench Single 1037 2072
Geekbench Multi 2386 6649
Display 6.7" AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 2712x1220
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6500 mAh
Charging 33W 90W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 8 MP
Front camera 8 MP 20 MP
RAM 6GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 128GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 800 nits 3200 nits
NFC no yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 163.2×76.1×7.6 mm 163.1×77.9×8.2 mm
Weight 174 g 215 g
Launch price $139 $399

Camera comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • Main: 50MP
  • Front: 8MP
30
camera

Poco F7

  • Main: 50MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
37
camera

Display comparison

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Poco F7

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display

Battery and charging

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
46
battery

Poco F7

  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
68
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and Poco F7, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Lava Blaze Amoled 2 MediaTek Dimensity 7060
50/100
693978 AnTuTu
Poco F7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 4
66/100 +68.4%
2199079 AnTuTu

Poco F7 leads Lava Blaze Amoled 2 by 68.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Lava Blaze Amoled 2

$139

Poco F7

$399

Launch price difference: $260. Lava Blaze Amoled 2 was $260 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (80/100 vs 51/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Poco F7 and the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 are nearly equal (83/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Poco F7 is a bit better (37/100 vs 30/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Poco F7 notably outperforms the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 (68/100 vs 46/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 significantly outperforms the Poco F7 (79/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Poco F7?

The Poco F7 is noticeably better than the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 and the Poco F7?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Poco F7 — 66/100.

Which has the better camera: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Poco F7?

The Poco F7 leads on camera score (37/100 vs 30/100).

Which is more powerful: the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 or the Poco F7?

The Poco F7 leads on performance (80/100 vs 51/100).

Should you choose the Lava Blaze Amoled 2 over the Poco F7?

The Lava Blaze Amoled 2 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Poco F7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.