Honor X40 GT Racing vs Poco F4
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Poco F4 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F4 leads — 37/100 vs 30/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Poco F4
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4500 mAh
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 35/100)
- Faster charging: 67W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 195g vs 199g
- Higher performance (8/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (41/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (56/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Poco F4, the Poco F4 scores 7 points higher (37/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco F4 leads (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F4 leads (86/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F4 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Poco F4 is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 35/100). In the "design" category, the Poco F4 is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F4 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (86/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Poco F4 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 970273 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 2400x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4500 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 67W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 12 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP53 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 163.2×76.0×7.7 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 195 g | |
| Price | — | $350 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco F4
- Main: 64MP f/1.79
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco F4
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Poco F4
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F4 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F4 is a bit better (41/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 35/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Poco F4 is a bit better (56/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco F4 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (86/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco F4?
The Poco F4 edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco F4?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Poco F4 — 37/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco F4?
The Poco F4 leads on camera score (41/100 vs 27/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco F4?
The Poco F4 leads on performance (8/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Poco F4?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco F4 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.