Honor X40 GT Racing vs Poco M6 Plus
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Poco M6 Plus (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco M6 Plus leads — 32/100 vs 30/100 (a 2-point difference). Key differences: the Poco M6 Plus has the bigger battery (5030 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Poco M6 Plus doesn't.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Poco M6 Plus
- Faster charging: 66W vs 33W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 205g
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 41/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 5030 vs 4800 mAh
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (37/100 vs 27/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Poco M6 Plus, the Poco M6 Plus scores 2 points higher (32/100 vs 30/100). In the "camera" category, the Poco M6 Plus leads (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Poco M6 Plus is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco M6 Plus are nearly equal (43/100 vs 41/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Poco M6 Plus | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 AE | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2460 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5030 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 108 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 13 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HyperOS | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 550 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP53 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 168.6×76.3×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 205 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco M6 Plus
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco M6 Plus
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Poco M6 Plus
- 5030 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco M6 Plus is a bit better (37/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco M6 Plus are nearly equal (43/100 vs 41/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco M6 Plus?
The Poco M6 Plus edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 2 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco M6 Plus?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Poco M6 Plus — 32/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco M6 Plus?
The Poco M6 Plus leads on camera score (37/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Poco M6 Plus?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco M6 Plus is a better fit for everyday use.