Honor X40 GT Racing vs Poco F8
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Poco F8 (2026) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F8 leads — 61/100 vs 30/100 (a 31-point difference). Key differences: the Poco F8 has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 4800).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Poco F8
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 199g vs 205g
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 4800 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 66W
- Higher performance (65/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (32/100 vs 27/100)
- Longer battery life (72/100 vs 43/100)
- Better value for money (75/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Poco F8, the Poco F8 scores 31 points higher (61/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 leads (65/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 leads (72/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F8 leads (75/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (65/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 is a bit better (32/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (72/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F8 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (75/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Poco F8 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | — | 2760000 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.6" OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 205 g | |
| Price | — | $499 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco F8
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco F8
- 6.6" OLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Poco F8
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F8 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (65/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F8 is a bit better (32/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco F8 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (72/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco F8 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (75/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco F8?
The Poco F8 significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing by 31 points (61/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco F8?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Poco F8 — 61/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco F8?
The Poco F8 leads on camera score (32/100 vs 27/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco F8?
The Poco F8 leads on performance (65/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Poco F8?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco F8 is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.