Honor X40 GT Racing vs Poco C40
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Poco C40 (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 11/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Poco C40 has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Poco C40
- Faster charging: 66W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Lighter: 199g vs 204g
- Better camera (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 45/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4800 mAh
- Longer battery life (45/100 vs 43/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Poco C40, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 19 points higher (30/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Poco C40 (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Poco C40 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100). In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Poco C40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | JLQ | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1650 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 18W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 3GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 32GB / 64GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 169.6×76.6×9.2 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 204 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco C40
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco C40
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1650
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Poco C40
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Poco C40 (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Poco C40 (27/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Poco C40 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (45/100 vs 43/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (51/100 vs 45/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco C40?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably better than the Poco C40 — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco C40?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Poco C40 — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco C40?
The Honor X40 GT Racing leads on camera score (27/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Poco C40?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco C40 is a better fit for everyday use.