Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo Y300 Plus
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo Y300 Plus (2024) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y300 Plus leads — 33/100 vs 30/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y300 Plus has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 Plus doesn't; the Vivo Y300 Plus is noticeably lighter (172g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo Y300 Plus
- Faster charging: 66W vs 44W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 42/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 172g vs 199g
- Better camera (34/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (85/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo Y300 Plus, the Vivo Y300 Plus scores 3 points higher (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y300 Plus is a bit better (34/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo Y300 Plus are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y300 Plus significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (85/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo Y300 Plus | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G | |
| AnTuTu | — | 592015 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 905 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2003 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 44W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | — | IP54 | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.4×74.9×7.5 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 172 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y300 Plus
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo Y300 Plus
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y300 Plus
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 44W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo Y300 Plus is a bit better (34/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo Y300 Plus are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y300 Plus significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (85/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo Y300 Plus?
The Vivo Y300 Plus edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo Y300 Plus?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo Y300 Plus — 33/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo Y300 Plus?
The Vivo Y300 Plus leads on camera score (34/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo Y300 Plus?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y300 Plus is a better fit for everyday use.