Honor X40 GT Racing vs Vivo Y32t
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Vivo Y32t (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads — 30/100 vs 11/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4800); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the Honor X40 GT Racing has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Vivo Y32t is noticeably lighter (179g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Vivo Y32t
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (27/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 179g vs 199g
- Better design/ergonomics (76/100 vs 51/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Vivo Y32t, the Honor X40 GT Racing scores 19 points higher (30/100 vs 11/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (27/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (76/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | — | — | |
| Geekbench Single | — | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | — | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 179 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing significantly outperforms the Vivo Y32t (100/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (27/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing is a bit better (43/100 vs 36/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y32t notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (76/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is noticeably better than the Vivo Y32t — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor X40 GT Racing leads on camera score (27/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Vivo Y32t?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.