Infinix Hot 60 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Infinix Hot 60 (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7020, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $120 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 33/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 806,012); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Infinix Hot 60 doesn't; the Infinix Hot 60 is noticeably lighter (193g vs 309g).
Infinix Hot 60
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 193g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $120 vs $2899
- Better design/ergonomics (58/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 806012
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 2398
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 1/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 24/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Infinix Hot 60 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 24 points higher (57/100 vs 33/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 1/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "value for money" category, the Infinix Hot 60 leads (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 60 (67/100 vs 1/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 60 (49/100 vs 24/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "design" category, the Infinix Hot 60 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (58/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Infinix Hot 60 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Infinix Hot 60 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7020 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 806012 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1061 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2398 | 9300 | |
| Display | 6.7" IPS LCD | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1600x720 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 700 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 166.0×76.8×7.8 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $120 | $2899 |
Infinix Hot 60
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Infinix Hot 60
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1600x720
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix Hot 60
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Infinix Hot 60 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Infinix Hot 60 by 72.5% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2779. Infinix Hot 60 is cheaper by $2779.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 60 (67/100 vs 1/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Infinix Hot 60 (49/100 vs 24/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Infinix Hot 60 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (58/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Infinix Hot 60 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Infinix Hot 60 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Infinix Hot 60 by 24 points (57/100 vs 33/100).
What is the rating of the Infinix Hot 60 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Hot 60 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix Hot 60 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 24/100).
Which is more powerful: the Infinix Hot 60 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 1/100).
Should you choose the Infinix Hot 60 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Hot 60 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users.