Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Infinix Note 60 Ultra (2026) runs on the Dimensity 8400 Ultimate, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $499 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra leads — 78/100 vs 69/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Infinix Note 60 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,989,585); the Infinix Note 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (220g vs 309g).
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 220g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $499 vs $2899
- Better camera (74/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (92/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (48/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (82/100 vs 42/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1989585
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 1579
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 6100
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 76/100)
Comparing the Infinix Note 60 Ultra vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra scores 9 points higher (78/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra leads (74/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra leads (87/100 vs 63/100). In the "value for money" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra leads (82/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Infinix Note 60 Ultra (91/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (92/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (74/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (48/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (82/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Infinix Note 60 Ultra | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 8400 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 1989585 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1579 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6100 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1208x2644 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.3×77.2×7.9 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 220 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $499 | $2899 |
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1208x2644
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Infinix Note 60 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Infinix Note 60 Ultra and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Infinix Note 60 Ultra by 32.0% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2400. Infinix Note 60 Ultra is cheaper by $2400.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Infinix Note 60 Ultra (91/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (92/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (74/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (48/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Infinix Note 60 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (82/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Infinix Note 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Note 60 Ultra edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Infinix Note 60 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Note 60 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Infinix Note 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Note 60 Ultra leads on camera score (74/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Infinix Note 60 Ultra or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Infinix Note 60 Ultra over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Infinix Note 60 Ultra is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.