Honor X40 GT Racing vs Poco F3
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Poco F3 (2021) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco F3 leads — 34/100 vs 30/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Honor X40 GT Racing has the bigger battery (4800 mAh vs 4520); the main camera is 50 MP vs 48 MP.
Honor X40 GT Racing
Poco F3
- Bigger battery: 4800 vs 4520 mAh
- Faster charging: 66W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 28/100)
- Lighter: 196g vs 199g
- Higher performance (8/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (31/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (55/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (84/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Poco F3, the Poco F3 scores 4 points higher (34/100 vs 30/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing leads (43/100 vs 28/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F3 leads (84/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Poco F3 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Poco F3 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (31/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Poco F3 (43/100 vs 28/100). In the "design" category, the Poco F3 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (55/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco F3 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (84/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Poco F3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 994842 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | 2400x1080 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 4520 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 33W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 48 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | Android 11 | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 196 g | |
| Price | — | $370 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco F3
- Main: 48MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 20MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco F3
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2400x1080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Poco F3
- 4520 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Poco F3 is a bit better (8/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco F3 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (31/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing notably outperforms the Poco F3 (43/100 vs 28/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Poco F3 and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (55/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco F3 notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (84/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco F3?
The Poco F3 edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco F3?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Poco F3 — 34/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco F3?
The Poco F3 leads on performance (8/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Poco F3?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco F3 is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.