Honor X40 GT Racing vs Poco M7 Pro
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing (2023) and the Poco M7 Pro (2025) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Poco M7 Pro leads — 33/100 vs 30/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Poco M7 Pro has the bigger battery (5110 mAh vs 4800); the Poco M7 Pro is noticeably lighter (180g vs 199g).
Honor X40 GT Racing
Poco M7 Pro
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Longer battery life (43/100 vs 39/100)
- Bigger battery: 5110 vs 4800 mAh
- Lighter: 180g vs 199g
- Better camera (29/100 vs 27/100)
- Better design/ergonomics (75/100 vs 51/100)
- Better value for money (95/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Honor X40 GT Racing vs the Poco M7 Pro, the Poco M7 Pro scores 3 points higher (33/100 vs 30/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco M7 Pro leads (95/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Poco M7 Pro and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (29/100 vs 27/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco M7 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100). In the "design" category, the Poco M7 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (75/100 vs 51/100). In the "value for money" category, the Poco M7 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (95/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Honor X40 GT Racing | Poco M7 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | — | 662157 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 1011 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2813 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2388 | — | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4800 mAh | 5110 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 6GB / 8GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 13, Magic OS 7.1 | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Dimensions | 166.1×75.8×8.5 mm | — | |
| Weight | 199 g | 180 g | |
| Price | — | $220 |
Honor X40 GT Racing
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Poco M7 Pro
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2388
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Poco M7 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor X40 GT Racing
- 4800 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Poco M7 Pro
- 5110 mAh
- No wireless charging
Honor X40 GT Racing
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Poco M7 Pro and the Honor X40 GT Racing are nearly equal (29/100 vs 27/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco M7 Pro are nearly equal (43/100 vs 39/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Poco M7 Pro notably outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (75/100 vs 51/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Poco M7 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor X40 GT Racing (95/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Honor X40 GT Racing or the Poco M7 Pro?
The Poco M7 Pro edges out the Honor X40 GT Racing by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor X40 GT Racing and the Poco M7 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Poco M7 Pro — 33/100.
Should you choose the Honor X40 GT Racing over the Poco M7 Pro?
The Honor X40 GT Racing is a better fit for everyday use. The Poco M7 Pro is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.