Honor 200 Lite vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor 200 Lite (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $206 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 45/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 567,996); the Honor 200 Lite is noticeably lighter (166g vs 309g).
Honor 200 Lite
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Lighter: 166g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $206 vs $2899
- Better portability (92/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (52/100 vs 42/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 567996
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2020
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 35W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (52/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 68/100)
Comparing the Honor 200 Lite vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 24 points higher (69/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (91/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (52/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 Lite leads (52/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (91/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Honor 200 Lite are nearly equal (70/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (52/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (63/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (92/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 Lite is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Honor 200 Lite | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 567996 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2020 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 15W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 86 | — | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 161.1×74.6×6.8 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 166 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $206 | $2899 |
Honor 200 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Honor 200 Lite
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 200 Lite
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Honor 200 Lite and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Honor 200 Lite by 80.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2693. Honor 200 Lite is cheaper by $2693.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (91/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Honor 200 Lite are nearly equal (70/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (52/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (63/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (92/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Honor 200 Lite is a bit better (52/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Honor 200 Lite or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite by 24 points (69/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Lite and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 200 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Lite or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (52/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Lite or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (91/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Lite over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor 200 Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.