Honor Magic7 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor Magic7 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; estimated prices are $550 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 leads — 78/100 vs 69/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic7 has the bigger battery (5650 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Honor Magic7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,119,308 vs 2,926,532); the Honor Magic7 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Honor Magic7
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Higher AnTuTu: 3119308 vs 2926532
- Bigger battery: 5650 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $550 vs $2899
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (56/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (76/100 vs 42/100)
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 69/100
Comparing the Honor Magic7 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Honor Magic7 scores 9 points higher (78/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 leads (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic7 leads (76/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (76/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Honor Magic7 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 3119308 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 2800x1256 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5650 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×75.8×8.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Price | $550 | $2899 |
Honor Magic7
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.4
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Honor Magic7
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1256
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Magic7
- 5650 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
We compared Honor Magic7 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic7 leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 6.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2349. Honor Magic7 is cheaper by $2349.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (92/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (56/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Honor Magic7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (76/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic7 edges out the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic7 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic7 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.