Honor Magic7 vs Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
The Honor Magic7 (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $599 and $2899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Magic7 leads — 84/100 vs 69/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Honor Magic7 has the bigger battery (5650 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Honor Magic7 is faster in AnTuTu (2,967,184 vs 2,926,532); the Honor Magic7 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor Magic7
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
What makes Honor Magic7 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2967184 vs 2926532
- Bigger battery: 5650 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 80W vs 15W
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $599 vs $2899
- Higher performance (91/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (60/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 69/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor Magic7 vs the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, the Honor Magic7 scores 15 points higher (84/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 leads (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 leads (81/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Honor Magic7 — 82/100, Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor Magic7 | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 2967184 | 2926532 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3013 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 9287 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | |
| Resolution | 1264x2800 | 2160x1584 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5650 mAh | 5600 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 45W | |
| Wireless charging | 80W | 15W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 10 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 / One UI 8 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP48 | |
| Dimensions | 162.1×75.8×8.0 mm | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | |
| Weight | 199 g | 309 g | |
| Launch price | $599 | $2899 |
Camera comparison
Honor Magic7
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Display comparison
Honor Magic7
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1264x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor Magic7
- 5650 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 80W
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor Magic7 and Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Magic7 leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 1.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2300. Honor Magic7 was $2300 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Magic7 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (91/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Honor Magic7 is a bit better (84/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Honor Magic7 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (81/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor Magic7 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (60/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor Magic7 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic7 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Honor Magic7 and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic7 has a MobileRank rating of 84/100, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 69/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor Magic7 or the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic7 leads on camera score (81/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Honor Magic7 over the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold?
The Honor Magic7 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.