Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi 17T Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $2899 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads — 82/100 vs 69/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17T Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17T Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,207,005 vs 2,926,532); the Xiaomi 17T Pro is noticeably lighter (205g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 69/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3207005 vs 2926532
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 3041
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 9494
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 205g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $899 vs $2899
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 91/100)
- Better camera (63/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 20/100)
- Better value for money (76/100 vs 42/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Xiaomi 17T Pro, the Xiaomi 17T Pro scores 13 points higher (82/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (63/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (87/100 vs 63/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (76/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (54/100 vs 20/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (76/100 vs 42/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Xiaomi 17T Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 3207005 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | 9553 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 309 g | 205 g | |
| Price | $2899 | $899 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 18:30 hrs, total 36:42 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Xiaomi 17T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17T Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 8.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2000. Xiaomi 17T Pro is cheaper by $2000.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 91/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (54/100 vs 20/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (76/100 vs 42/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Xiaomi 17T Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Xiaomi 17T Pro — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Xiaomi 17T Pro leads on camera score (63/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.