Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Xiaomi 17T Pro
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi 17T Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $2899 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads — 82/100 vs 69/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17T Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17T Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,182,664 vs 2,926,532); the Xiaomi 17T Pro is noticeably lighter (205g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Xiaomi 17T Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Overall rating 69/100
What makes Xiaomi 17T Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3182664 vs 2926532
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 3013
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 9287
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5600 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 205g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $2899
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (63/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (87/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Xiaomi 17T Pro, the Xiaomi 17T Pro scores 13 points higher (82/100 vs 69/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (63/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro leads (87/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100, Xiaomi 17T Pro — 76/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (54/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Xiaomi 17T Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 3182664 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 10243 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 2772x1280 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | — | |
| Weight | 309 g | 205 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | $899 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1280
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Xiaomi 17T Pro
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 18:30 hrs, total 36:42 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Xiaomi 17T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17T Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold by 8.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2000. Xiaomi 17T Pro was $2000 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (93/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (94/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro is a bit better (63/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (54/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Xiaomi 17T Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Xiaomi 17T Pro — 82/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Xiaomi 17T Pro leads on camera score (63/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Xiaomi 17T Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 17T Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.