Honor 200 Lite vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Honor 200 Lite (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500; estimated prices are $206 and $899. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 45/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 567,996); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 86); the Honor 200 Lite is noticeably lighter (166g vs 226g).
Honor 200 Lite
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 166g vs 226g
- Cheaper: $206 vs $899
- Better portability (92/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 567996
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 2020
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 35W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 68/100)
- Better value for money (86/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Honor 200 Lite vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 42 points higher (87/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 36/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 52/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (93/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (84/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (81/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (86/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Honor 200 Lite | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 567996 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2020 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 86 | 171 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.1×74.6×6.8 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 166 g | 226 g | |
| Price | $206 | $899 |
Honor 200 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor 200 Lite
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor 200 Lite
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor 200 Lite and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Honor 200 Lite by 82.6% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $693. Honor 200 Lite is cheaper by $693.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (93/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (84/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (96/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (81/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (92/100 vs 43/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (86/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Honor 200 Lite or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite by 42 points (87/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Lite and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor 200 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Lite or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Lite or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Lite over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor 200 Lite is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.