Honor 200 Lite vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Honor 200 Lite (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 45/100 (a 46-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 108 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 573,460); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 86); the Honor 200 Lite is noticeably lighter (166g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Honor 200 Lite
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Honor 200 Lite better?
- Lighter: 166g vs 230g
- Better portability (92/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 573460
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2020
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 35W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 44/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 31/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 36/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 68/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Honor 200 Lite vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 46 points higher (91/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 36/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (99/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (89/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (96/100 vs 31/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (85/100 vs 36/100). In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (92/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Honor 200 Lite | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 573460 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2020 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.7" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2412 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4500 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 35W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 86 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 5 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, MagicOS 8 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 161.1×74.6×6.8 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 166 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Honor 200 Lite
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 5MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Honor 200 Lite
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2412
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Honor 200 Lite
- 4500 mAh
- Wired: 35W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Honor 200 Lite and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Honor 200 Lite by 86.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Honor 200 Lite
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (99/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (89/100 vs 68/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (96/100 vs 31/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite (85/100 vs 36/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Honor 200 Lite significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (92/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Honor 200 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Honor 200 Lite by 46 points (91/100 vs 45/100).
What is the rating of the Honor 200 Lite and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Honor 200 Lite has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Honor 200 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 31/100).
Which is more powerful: the Honor 200 Lite or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Honor 200 Lite over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.