Honor Robot Phone vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Honor Robot Phone (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Honor Robot Phone leads — 91/100 vs 87/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6000); the Honor Robot Phone is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 3,269,794).
Honor Robot Phone
Vivo X300 Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 3269794
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 3228
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 9553
- Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 93/100)
- Better camera (100/100 vs 96/100)
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6000 mAh
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 72/100)
Comparing the Honor Robot Phone vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Honor Robot Phone scores 4 points higher (91/100 vs 87/100). In the "performance" category, the Honor Robot Phone is a bit better (98/100 vs 93/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100. In the "camera" category, the Honor Robot Phone and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (100/100 vs 96/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 72/100).
| Specification | Honor Robot Phone | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 3942923 | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1280x2788 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | — | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, MagicOS 10 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 226 g | |
| Price | — | $834 |
Honor Robot Phone
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Honor Robot Phone
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1280x2788
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Honor Robot Phone
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Honor Robot Phone and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Honor Robot Phone leads Vivo X300 Pro by 20.6% in our overall performance rating.
Honor Robot Phone
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Honor Robot Phone is a bit better (98/100 vs 93/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 84/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Honor Robot Phone and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (100/100 vs 96/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 72/100).
Which is better: the Honor Robot Phone or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor Robot Phone edges out the Vivo X300 Pro by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Honor Robot Phone and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor Robot Phone has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which is more powerful: the Honor Robot Phone or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor Robot Phone leads on performance (98/100 vs 93/100).
Should you choose the Honor Robot Phone over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Honor Robot Phone is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.