Google Pixel Fold vs OPPO Reno 16 Pro
The Google Pixel Fold (2023) runs on the Google Tensor G2, while the OPPO Reno 16 Pro (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500s. By overall MobileRank rating, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 64/100 (a 22-point difference). Key differences: the OPPO Reno 16 Pro has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4821); the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,079,298 vs 859,865); the Google Pixel Fold is thinner (5.8mm vs 8.2mm).
Google Pixel Fold
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Overall rating 64/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3079298 vs 859865
- Better Geekbench Single: 2680 vs 1459
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8358 vs 3451
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4821 mAh
- Higher performance (89/100 vs 60/100)
- Better camera (94/100 vs 67/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 60/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 78/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 52/100)
Comparing the Google Pixel Fold vs the OPPO Reno 16 Pro, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro scores 22 points higher (86/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (89/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads (83/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (89/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (94/100 vs 67/100). In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (83/100 vs 60/100). In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Google Pixel Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
| Specification | Google Pixel Fold | OPPO Reno 16 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G2 | MediaTek Dimensity 9500s | |
| AnTuTu | 859865 | 3079298 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1459 | 2680 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3451 | 8358 | |
| Display | 7.6" Foldable OLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1840x2208 | 2772x1272 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4821 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 133 | — | |
| Main camera | — | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1550 nits | 3600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 158.7×139.7×5.8 mm | 151.2×72.4×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 283 g | — | |
| Launch price | — | $661 |
Google Pixel Fold
- Main: —
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Front: 8MP
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Google Pixel Fold
- 7.6" Foldable OLED
- Resolution: 1840x2208
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2772x1272
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Google Pixel Fold
- 4821 mAh
- Wireless: supported, wattage unknown
OPPO Reno 16 Pro
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Google Pixel Fold and OPPO Reno 16 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads Google Pixel Fold by 72.1% in our overall performance rating.
Google Pixel Fold
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (89/100 vs 60/100).
display
In the "display" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a bit better (84/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (94/100 vs 67/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro notably outperforms the Google Pixel Fold (83/100 vs 60/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro and the Google Pixel Fold are nearly equal (54/100 vs 52/100).
Which is better: the Google Pixel Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro significantly outperforms the Google Pixel Fold by 22 points (86/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel Fold and the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Google Pixel Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the OPPO Reno 16 Pro — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on camera score (94/100 vs 67/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel Fold or the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The OPPO Reno 16 Pro leads on performance (89/100 vs 60/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel Fold over the OPPO Reno 16 Pro?
The Google Pixel Fold is a better fit for active users. The OPPO Reno 16 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.