Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1799 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 64/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,401,321); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 129); the Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (230g vs 257g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold better?
- Better portability (52/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1401321
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1707
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4431
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4650 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 21W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 48MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 7W
- Lighter: 230g vs 257g
- Cheaper at launch: $950 vs $1799
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 70/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 64/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 78/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 27 points higher (91/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — 36/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (99/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (85/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Google Tensor G4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1401321 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1707 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4431 | 11047 | |
| Display | 8.0" AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2076x2152 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4650 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 21W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 7W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 129 | 170 | |
| Main camera | 48 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2700 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IPX8 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 257 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $1799 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- Main: 48MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 10MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 8.0" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2076x2152
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold
- 4650 mAh
- Wired: 21W
- Wireless: 7W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 67.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $849. Vivo X300 Ultra was $849 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (99/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 78/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (96/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (85/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 27 points (91/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.