Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs Vivo X500

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (2024) runs on the Google Tensor G4, while the Vivo X500 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9600M; launch prices were $1799 and $820. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X500 leads — 89/100 vs 64/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X500 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 48 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X500 is faster in AnTuTu (3,930,719 vs 1,401,321); the Vivo X500 is noticeably lighter (211g vs 257g).

The Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 25 points (89/100 vs 64/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

Performance 70
Display 78
Camera 64
Battery 42
Portability 52
Value for money 36

Vivo X500

Performance 96
Display 94
Camera 87
Battery 84
Portability 50
Value for money 92

What makes Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold better?


  • Better portability (52/100 vs 50/100)

What makes Vivo X500 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3930719 vs 1401321
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3302 vs 1707
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10240 vs 4431
  • Bigger battery: 7500 vs 4650 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 21W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 48MP
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 7W
  • Lighter: 211g vs 257g
  • Cheaper at launch: $820 vs $1799

  • Higher performance (96/100 vs 70/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 64/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 42/100)
  • Better display (94/100 vs 78/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold vs the Vivo X500, the Vivo X500 scores 25 points higher (89/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 leads (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 leads (87/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 leads (84/100 vs 42/100). Value score: Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold — 36/100, Vivo X500 — 92/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (96/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (87/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (84/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Vivo X500 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold: The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X500: The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Vivo X500
Processor Google Tensor G4 MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
AnTuTu 1401321 3930719
Geekbench Single 1707 3302
Geekbench Multi 4431 10240
Display 8.0" AMOLED 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 2076x2152 1260x2750
Refresh rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 4650 mAh 7500 mAh
Charging 21W 90W
Wireless charging 7W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 129 —
Main camera 48 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 10 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 64 MP
Front camera 10 MP 50 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 2700 nits 4000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IPX8 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 155.2×150.2×5.1 mm 157.0×75.0×8.2 mm
Weight 257 g 211 g
Launch price $1799 $820

Camera comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • Main: 48MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 10MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
64
camera

Vivo X500

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • 8.0" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2076x2152
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Vivo X500

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2750
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display

Battery and charging

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

  • 4650 mAh
  • Wired: 21W
  • Wireless: 7W
42
battery

Vivo X500

  • 7500 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
84
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and Vivo X500, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Google Tensor G4
64/100
1401321 AnTuTu
Vivo X500 MediaTek Dimensity 9600M
89/100 +64.3%
3930719 AnTuTu

Vivo X500 leads Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 64.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold

$1799

Vivo X500

$820

Launch price difference: $979. Vivo X500 was $979 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (96/100 vs 70/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (94/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X500 notably outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (87/100 vs 64/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (84/100 vs 42/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Vivo X500 are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 significantly outperforms the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold by 25 points (89/100 vs 64/100).

What is the rating of the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold and the Vivo X500?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Vivo X500 — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 64/100).

Which is more powerful: the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold or the Vivo X500?

The Vivo X500 leads on performance (96/100 vs 70/100).

Should you choose the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold over the Vivo X500?

The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X500 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.