Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 62/100 (a 29-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 200 MP vs 108 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,294,871); the Vivo X300 Ultra is thinner (8.2mm vs 9.5mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1294871
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4650 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 48/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 57/100)
- Better portability (39/100 vs 32/100)
What makes Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 220g vs 230g
- Overall rating 62/100
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 29 points higher (91/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro (96/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro (85/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | 4188 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.7" OLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 4650 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 5 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 12, Joy UI 13 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 163.9×76.5×9.5 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 220 g | |
| Launch price | $950 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 13MP
- Telephoto: 5MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
- 4650 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro by 228.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro (99/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 89/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro (96/100 vs 48/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro (85/100 vs 57/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (39/100 vs 32/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro by 29 points (91/100 vs 62/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro — 62/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 48/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro is a better fit for active users.