Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra vs Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 62/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 4650); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 1,294,871).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro by 27 points (89/100 vs 62/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 92

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro

Performance 68
Display 89
Camera 48
Battery 57
Portability 32
Value for money —

What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 1294871
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1662
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4188
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 4650 mAh

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 48/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 57/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (35/100 vs 32/100)

What makes Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro better?

  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 220g vs 227g

  • Overall rating 62/100

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra vs the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 27 points higher (89/100 vs 62/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro (99/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro (92/100 vs 57/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro are nearly equal (35/100 vs 32/100).

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro: The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 4602290 1294871
Geekbench Single 3639 1662
Geekbench Multi 11047 4188
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.7" OLED
Resolution 1440x3168 1080x2400
Refresh rate 144 Hz 144 Hz
Battery 7400 mAh 4650 mAh
Charging 120W 120W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 50 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 13 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 5 MP
Front camera 32 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB / 24GB 8GB / 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 Android 12, Joy UI 13
Brightness (peak) 8000 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 —
Dimensions 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm 163.9×76.5×9.5 mm
Weight 227 g 220 g
Launch price $799 —

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro

  • Main: 108MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 13MP
  • Telephoto: 5MP
  • Front: 16MP
48
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro

  • 6.7" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro

  • 4650 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
57
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100
4602290 AnTuTu
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
62/100 -255.4%
1294871 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro by 255.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra

$799

Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro (99/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro (78/100 vs 48/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro (92/100 vs 57/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro are nearly equal (35/100 vs 32/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro by 27 points (89/100 vs 62/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro — 62/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 48/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra or the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra over the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro is a better fit for active users.