Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 13T Pro
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 13T Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+; launch prices were $950 and $600. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 72/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,732,028); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 131); the Xiaomi 13T Pro is noticeably lighter (200g vs 230g).
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi 13T Pro
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1732028
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1917
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4509
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 74/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 66/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 64/100)
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 200g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $600 vs $950
- Better display (93/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (54/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 13T Pro, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 19 points higher (91/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100, Xiaomi 13T Pro — 56/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (99/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 13T Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (96/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 13T Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi 13T Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 1732028 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1917 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 4509 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 2712x1220 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 120W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | 131 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 162.2×75.7×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | $950 | $600 |
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 13T Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 13T Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2712x1220
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 13T Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 13T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi 13T Pro by 145.2% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $350. Xiaomi 13T Pro was $350 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (99/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 13T Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra are nearly equal (93/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (96/100 vs 66/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13T Pro (85/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 13T Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (54/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 13T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 13T Pro — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 13T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi 13T Pro — 72/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 13T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 66/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 13T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi 13T Pro?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 13T Pro is a better fit for active users.