Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 11T Pro

The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 11T Pro (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888; launch prices were $950 and $500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 61/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 108 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,127,120); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 108); the Xiaomi 11T Pro is noticeably lighter (204g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro by 30 points (91/100 vs 61/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Performance 63
Display 79
Camera 48
Battery 64
Portability 48
Value for money 48
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1127120
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1488
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3373
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 48/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Xiaomi 11T Pro better?
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
  • Lighter: 204g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $950

  • Better portability (48/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 11T Pro, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 30 points higher (91/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100, Xiaomi 11T Pro — 48/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (99/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (96/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (85/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 11T Pro is a bit better (48/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 11T Pro: The Xiaomi 11T Pro is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo X300 Ultra Xiaomi 11T Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
AnTuTu 4247433 1127120
Geekbench Single 3640 1488
Geekbench Multi 11033 3373
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 3168x1440 2400x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 100W 120W
Wireless charging 40W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 170 108
Main camera 200 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 11
Brightness (peak) 1000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69 IP53
Dimensions 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm 164.1×76.9×8.8 mm
Weight 230 g 204 g
Launch price $950 $500
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Xiaomi 11T Pro
  • Main: 108MP f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
48
camera
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Xiaomi 11T Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Xiaomi 11T Pro
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
64
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 11T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100
4247433 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 11T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
61/100 -276.8%
1127120 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi 11T Pro by 276.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Xiaomi 11T Pro
$500

Launch price difference: $450. Xiaomi 11T Pro was $450 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (99/100 vs 63/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (96/100 vs 48/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (85/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 11T Pro is a bit better (48/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 11T Pro?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro by 30 points (91/100 vs 61/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 11T Pro?

The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi 11T Pro — 61/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 11T Pro?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 48/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 11T Pro?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 63/100).

Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi 11T Pro?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 11T Pro is a better fit for active users.