Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra vs Xiaomi 11T Pro

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 11T Pro (2021) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888; launch prices were $799 and $500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 61/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (7400 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 108 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,602,290 vs 1,127,120); the Xiaomi 11T Pro is noticeably lighter (204g vs 227g).

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro by 28 points (89/100 vs 61/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 92
Portability 35
Value for money 90
Xiaomi 11T Pro
Performance 63
Display 79
Camera 48
Battery 64
Portability 48
Value for money 48
What makes Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4602290 vs 1127120
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1488
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3373
  • Bigger battery: 7400 vs 5000 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 63/100)
  • Better camera (78/100 vs 48/100)
  • Longer battery life (92/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 79/100)
What makes Xiaomi 11T Pro better?
  • Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 204g vs 227g
  • Cheaper at launch: $500 vs $799

  • Better portability (48/100 vs 35/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 11T Pro, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra scores 28 points higher (89/100 vs 61/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 64/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra — 90/100, Xiaomi 11T Pro — 48/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (99/100 vs 63/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (99/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (78/100 vs 48/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (92/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 11T Pro is a bit better (48/100 vs 35/100).

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 11T Pro: The Xiaomi 11T Pro is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Xiaomi 11T Pro
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
AnTuTu 4602290 1127120
Geekbench Single 3640 1488
Geekbench Multi 11033 3373
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3168 2400x1080
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 7400 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 120W 120W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 108
Main camera 50 MP 108 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB / 24GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 11
Brightness (peak) 8000 nits 1000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP53
Dimensions 163.7×76.8×8.7 mm 164.1×76.9×8.8 mm
Weight 227 g 204 g
Launch price $799 $500
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Xiaomi 11T Pro
  • Main: 108MP f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
48
camera
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display
Xiaomi 11T Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2400x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
  • 7400 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
92
battery
Xiaomi 11T Pro
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
64
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and Xiaomi 11T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100
4602290 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 11T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
61/100 -308.3%
1127120 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads Xiaomi 11T Pro by 308.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra
$799
Xiaomi 11T Pro
$500

Launch price difference: $299. Xiaomi 11T Pro was $299 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (99/100 vs 63/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (99/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (78/100 vs 48/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro (92/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 11T Pro is a bit better (48/100 vs 35/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra or the Xiaomi 11T Pro?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 11T Pro by 28 points (89/100 vs 61/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra and the Xiaomi 11T Pro?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Xiaomi 11T Pro — 61/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra or the Xiaomi 11T Pro?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on camera score (78/100 vs 48/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra or the Xiaomi 11T Pro?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 63/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra over the Xiaomi 11T Pro?

The Vivo iQOO 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 11T Pro is a better fit for active users.