Vivo X300 Pro vs ZTE V40 Pro
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the ZTE V40 Pro (2022) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 55/100 (a 33-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE V40 Pro doesn't; the ZTE V40 Pro is noticeably lighter (190g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
ZTE V40 Pro
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 65W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 55/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
What makes ZTE V40 Pro better?
- Lighter: 190g vs 226g
- Better portability (62/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the ZTE V40 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 33 points higher (88/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE V40 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (96/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (81/100 vs 55/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE V40 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (62/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | ZTE V40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Unisoc Tiger T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 3326259 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 65W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 163.9×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 190 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE V40 Pro
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE V40 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE V40 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE V40 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE V40 Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (96/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (81/100 vs 55/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE V40 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (62/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro by 33 points (88/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the ZTE V40 Pro — 55/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.