Vivo iQOO 15T vs ZTE V40 Pro
The Vivo iQOO 15T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the ZTE V40 Pro (2022) runs on the Unisoc Tiger T618. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads — 82/100 vs 55/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 15T has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5100); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo iQOO 15T has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE V40 Pro doesn't; the ZTE V40 Pro is noticeably lighter (190g vs 216g).
Vivo iQOO 15T
ZTE V40 Pro
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 65W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Better camera (65/100 vs 40/100)
- Longer battery life (75/100 vs 55/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 81/100)
- Lighter: 190g vs 216g
- Better portability (62/100 vs 44/100)
Comparing the Vivo iQOO 15T vs the ZTE V40 Pro, the Vivo iQOO 15T scores 27 points higher (82/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (65/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T leads (75/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (99/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (65/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (75/100 vs 55/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE V40 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (62/100 vs 44/100).
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 15T | ZTE V40 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | Unisoc Tiger T618 | |
| AnTuTu | 3815522 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3228 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9553 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 8000 mAh | 5100 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 65W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 6GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11 | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | — | 163.9×76.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 216 g | 190 g | |
| Price | $499 | — |
Vivo iQOO 15T
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE V40 Pro
- Main: 64MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE V40 Pro
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO 15T
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 65W
- No wireless charging
ZTE V40 Pro
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (99/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (65/100 vs 40/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 15T notably outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro (75/100 vs 55/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE V40 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 15T (62/100 vs 44/100).
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 15T or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 15T significantly outperforms the ZTE V40 Pro by 27 points (82/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 15T and the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 15T has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the ZTE V40 Pro — 55/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 15T or the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 15T leads on camera score (65/100 vs 40/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 15T over the ZTE V40 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO 15T is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE V40 Pro is a better fit for everyday use.