Vivo X300 Pro vs ZTE Blade A35
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the ZTE Blade A35 (2024) runs on the Unisoc. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 36/100 (a 52-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 8 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A35 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
ZTE Blade A35
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 43/100)
What makes ZTE Blade A35 better?
- Better portability (46/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the ZTE Blade A35, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 52 points higher (88/100 vs 36/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (84/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (81/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A35 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | ZTE Blade A35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 3326259 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 8 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 2GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 (Go edition) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 167.7×77.4×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | — | |
| Launch price | $899 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Blade A35
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 2MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A35
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Blade A35
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Blade A35
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (84/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (81/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A35 and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (46/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Blade A35?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 by 52 points (88/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE Blade A35?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the ZTE Blade A35 — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Blade A35?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the ZTE Blade A35?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.