Vivo X300 Ultra vs ZTE Blade A35
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Blade A35 (2024) runs on the Unisoc. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 36/100 (a 55-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 8 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Blade A35 doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
ZTE Blade A35
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 43/100)
What makes ZTE Blade A35 better?
- Better portability (46/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the ZTE Blade A35, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 55 points higher (91/100 vs 36/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (89/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (85/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A35 is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | ZTE Blade A35 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | Unisoc | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3639 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11047 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.8" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 8 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 2GB / 4GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 64GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 14 (Go edition) | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP69 | — | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | 167.7×77.4×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 230 g | — | |
| Launch price | $950 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Blade A35
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 2MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Blade A35
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Blade A35
- 5000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Blade A35
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (89/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 (85/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A35 is a bit better (46/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the ZTE Blade A35?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A35 by 55 points (91/100 vs 36/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the ZTE Blade A35?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the ZTE Blade A35 — 36/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the ZTE Blade A35?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the ZTE Blade A35?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.