Vivo X300 Pro vs ZTE Avid 589
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the ZTE Avid 589 (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 19/100 (a 69-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 8 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 177,554); the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Avid 589 doesn't; the ZTE Avid 589 is noticeably lighter (167g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
ZTE Avid 589
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 177554
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 233
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 723
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 10/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 15/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 42/100)
What makes ZTE Avid 589 better?
- Lighter: 167g vs 226g
- Better portability (80/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the ZTE Avid 589, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 69 points higher (88/100 vs 19/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (94/100 vs 10/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (84/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (81/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Avid 589 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (80/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | ZTE Avid 589 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | MediaTek Helio P22 | |
| AnTuTu | 3326259 | 177554 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | 233 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | 723 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 5.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 720x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 3000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | — | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 8 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 2 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11 (Go edition) | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 142.2×70.9×7.9 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 167 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
ZTE Avid 589
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 2MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Avid 589
- 5.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1440
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
ZTE Avid 589
- 3000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and ZTE Avid 589, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads ZTE Avid 589 by 1773.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
ZTE Avid 589
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (94/100 vs 10/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (84/100 vs 42/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (81/100 vs 15/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Avid 589 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (80/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Avid 589?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 by 69 points (88/100 vs 19/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the ZTE Avid 589?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the ZTE Avid 589 — 19/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Avid 589?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Pro or the ZTE Avid 589?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the ZTE Avid 589?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.