Vivo X300 Ultra vs ZTE Avid 589

The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the ZTE Avid 589 (2021) runs on the MediaTek Helio P22. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 18/100 (a 73-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 8 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 156,818); the Vivo X300 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the ZTE Avid 589 doesn't; the ZTE Avid 589 is noticeably lighter (167g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 by 73 points (91/100 vs 18/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
ZTE Avid 589
Performance 8
Display 42
Camera 10
Battery 15
Portability 80
Value for money
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 156818
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 233
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 723
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 3000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 8/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 15/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 42/100)
What makes ZTE Avid 589 better?
  • Lighter: 167g vs 230g

  • Better portability (80/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the ZTE Avid 589, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 73 points higher (91/100 vs 18/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 8/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 15/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (99/100 vs 8/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (89/100 vs 42/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (85/100 vs 15/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Avid 589 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (80/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
ZTE Avid 589: The ZTE Avid 589 is a better fit for everyday use.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo X300 Ultra ZTE Avid 589
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 MediaTek Helio P22
AnTuTu 4247433 156818
Geekbench Single 3640 233
Geekbench Multi 11033 723
Display 6.8" LTPO OLED 5.5" IPS LCD
Resolution 3168x1440 720x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz
Battery 7000 mAh 3000 mAh
Charging 100W
Wireless charging 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 200 MP 8 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 200 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 2 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 2GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 32GB
OS Android 16 Android 11 (Go edition)
NFC yes no
Protection IP69
Dimensions 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm 142.2×70.9×7.9 mm
Weight 230 g 167 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
ZTE Avid 589
  • Main: 8MP
  • Front: 2MP
10
camera
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
ZTE Avid 589
  • 5.5" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 720x1440
  • Refresh rate: —
42
display
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
ZTE Avid 589
  • 3000 mAh
  • Wireless charging: no data
15
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and ZTE Avid 589, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100
4247433 AnTuTu
ZTE Avid 589 MediaTek Helio P22
18/100 -2608.5%
156818 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads ZTE Avid 589 by 2608.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
ZTE Avid 589
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (99/100 vs 8/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (89/100 vs 42/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (96/100 vs 10/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 (85/100 vs 15/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the ZTE Avid 589 significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (80/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the ZTE Avid 589?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the ZTE Avid 589 by 73 points (91/100 vs 18/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the ZTE Avid 589?

The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the ZTE Avid 589 — 18/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the ZTE Avid 589?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the ZTE Avid 589?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 8/100).

Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the ZTE Avid 589?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Avid 589 is a better fit for everyday use.