Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 17T
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi 17T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra; launch prices were $899 and $449. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 71/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 2,026,828); the Xiaomi 17T is noticeably lighter (185g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
Xiaomi 17T
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 2026828
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 1555
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 6405
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 67W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 63/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 63/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17T better?
- Lighter: 185g vs 226g
- Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $899
- Better display (85/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (74/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the Xiaomi 17T, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 17 points higher (88/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100, Xiaomi 17T — 66/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17T (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T (81/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (74/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | Xiaomi 17T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 3326259 | 2026828 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | 1555 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | 6405 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 2756x1268 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 67W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 226 g | 185 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $449 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17T
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17T
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17T
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and Xiaomi 17T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Xiaomi 17T by 64.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $450. Xiaomi 17T was $450 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T (94/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17T and the Vivo X300 Pro are nearly equal (85/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17T (96/100 vs 63/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T (81/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (74/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17T?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 17T — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17T?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the Xiaomi 17T — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17T?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 63/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17T?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the Xiaomi 17T?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17T is a better fit for active users.