Vivo X300 Ultra vs Xiaomi 17T
The Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 17T (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra; launch prices were $950 and $449. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 71/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6500); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,047,329); the Xiaomi 17T is noticeably lighter (185g vs 230g).
Vivo X300 Ultra
Xiaomi 17T
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2047329
- Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1553
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 6403
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 67W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 63/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
- Lighter: 185g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $449 vs $950
- Better portability (74/100 vs 39/100)
Comparing the Vivo X300 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 17T, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 20 points higher (91/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 63/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100, Xiaomi 17T — 74/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T (99/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17T are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17T (96/100 vs 63/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T (85/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (74/100 vs 39/100).
| Specification | Vivo X300 Ultra | Xiaomi 17T | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | MediaTek Dimensity 8500 Ultra | |
| AnTuTu | 4247433 | 2047329 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3640 | 1553 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 11033 | 6403 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO OLED | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3168x1440 | 2756x1268 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6500 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 67W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 170 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | — | |
| Weight | 230 g | 185 g | |
| Launch price | $950 | $449 |
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17T
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17T
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 2756x1268
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17T
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 67W
- No wireless charging
We compared Vivo X300 Ultra and Xiaomi 17T, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Xiaomi 17T by 107.5% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $501. Xiaomi 17T was $501 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T (99/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17T are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17T (96/100 vs 63/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17T (85/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 17T significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (74/100 vs 39/100).
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17T?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17T by 20 points (91/100 vs 71/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Xiaomi 17T?
The Vivo X300 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 91/100, the Xiaomi 17T — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17T?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 63/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Ultra or the Xiaomi 17T?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Ultra over the Xiaomi 17T?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17T is a better fit for active users.