Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 13 Ultra
The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi 13 Ultra (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $899 and $900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 74/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 1,796,720); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 140); the Vivo X300 Pro is thinner (8.0mm vs 9.1mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 1796720
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2004
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 5311
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 226g vs 227g
- Cheaper at launch: $899 vs $900
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 76/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 73/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 73/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 31/100)
What makes Xiaomi 13 Ultra better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Better display (90/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the Xiaomi 13 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 14 points higher (88/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 73/100). Value score: Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100, Xiaomi 13 Ultra — 60/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Ultra (94/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 13 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Ultra (96/100 vs 73/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 73/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 31/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 Pro | Xiaomi 13 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 9500 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | 3326259 | 1796720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3293 | 2004 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 10243 | 5311 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6510 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 171 | 140 | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 13 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | 2600 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | 163.2×74.6×9.1 mm | |
| Weight | 226 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | $899 | $900 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 13 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 Pro and Xiaomi 13 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Xiaomi 13 Ultra by 85.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $1. Vivo X300 Pro was $1 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Ultra (94/100 vs 76/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 13 Ultra is a bit better (90/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Ultra (96/100 vs 73/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 73/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (43/100 vs 31/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 13 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 13 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 13 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the Xiaomi 13 Ultra — 74/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 13 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 73/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 13 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 76/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the Xiaomi 13 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 13 Ultra is a better fit for active users.