Vivo X300 Pro vs Xiaomi 12T Pro

The Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500, while the Xiaomi 12T Pro (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1; estimated prices are $899 and $600. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 68/100 (a 19-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5000); the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,269,794 vs 1,484,323); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Pro has the stronger camera (171 vs 129); the Xiaomi 12T Pro is noticeably lighter (205g vs 226g).

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 12T Pro — the overall rating gap is 19 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 Pro
Performance 93
Display 84
Camera 96
Battery 81
Portability 43
Value for money 86
Xiaomi 12T Pro
Performance 71
Display 83
Camera 64
Battery 64
Portability 50
Value for money 48
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3269794 vs 1484323
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1761
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 4688
  • Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5000 mAh

  • Higher performance (93/100 vs 71/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 64/100)
  • Longer battery life (81/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better display (84/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better value for money (86/100 vs 48/100)
What makes Xiaomi 12T Pro better?
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
  • Lighter: 205g vs 226g
  • Cheaper: $600 vs $899

  • Better portability (50/100 vs 43/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X300 Pro vs the Xiaomi 12T Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 19 points higher (87/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (86/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 12T Pro (93/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 12T Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 12T Pro (96/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 12T Pro (81/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 12T Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 12T Pro (86/100 vs 48/100).

Vivo X300 Pro: The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 12T Pro: The Xiaomi 12T Pro is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo X300 Pro Xiaomi 12T Pro
Processor Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
AnTuTu 3269794 1484323
Geekbench Single 3228 1761
Geekbench Multi 9553 4688
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2800 2712x1220
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6510 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 90W 120W
Wireless charging 40W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 171 129
Main camera 200 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 8 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 0 MP
Front camera 32 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 Android 12
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 900 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP53
Dimensions 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm 163.1×75.9×8.6 mm
Weight 226 g 205 g
Price $899 $600
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Xiaomi 12T Pro
  • Main: 200MP f/1.65
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 20MP
64
camera
Display comparison
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Xiaomi 12T Pro
  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2712x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
83
display
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 Pro
  • 6510 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 40W
81
battery
Xiaomi 12T Pro
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
64
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X300 Pro and Xiaomi 12T Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X300 Pro Dimensity 9500
87/100
3269794 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 12T Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1
68/100 -120.3%
1484323 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Pro leads Xiaomi 12T Pro by 120.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Vivo X300 Pro
$899
Xiaomi 12T Pro
$600

Price difference: $299. Xiaomi 12T Pro is cheaper by $299.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 12T Pro (93/100 vs 71/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 12T Pro are nearly equal (84/100 vs 83/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 12T Pro (96/100 vs 64/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 12T Pro (81/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Xiaomi 12T Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 43/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 12T Pro (86/100 vs 48/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 12T Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Xiaomi 12T Pro — the overall rating gap is 19 points.

What is the rating of the Vivo X300 Pro and the Xiaomi 12T Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 87/100, the Xiaomi 12T Pro — 68/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 12T Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 64/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 Pro or the Xiaomi 12T Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 71/100).

Should you choose the Vivo X300 Pro over the Xiaomi 12T Pro?

The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 12T Pro is a better fit for active users.