Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9300, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 73/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 5160); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,258,010 vs 2,415,558); the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 226g).
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
Vivo X300 Pro
- Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 190g vs 226g
- Better display (94/100 vs 84/100)
- Better portability (65/100 vs 43/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3258010 vs 2415558
- Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 2142
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 7125
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 5160 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (93/100 vs 83/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 67/100)
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 14 points higher (87/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (93/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 67/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (65/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 2415558 | 3258010 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2142 | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 7125 | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.5×75.7×8.0 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) by 25.9% in our overall performance rating.
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (93/100 vs 83/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) is a bit better (94/100 vs 84/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 67/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (65/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (93/100 vs 83/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.