Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9300, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 73/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5160); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,447,714); the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) is noticeably lighter (190g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) better?
- Faster charging: 120W vs 100W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 190g vs 230g
- Better display (94/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (65/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2447714
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2186
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 7422
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5160 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 83/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 67/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 18 points higher (91/100 vs 73/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 67/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) (85/100 vs 67/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (65/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2447714 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2186 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 7422 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5160 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1400 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.5×75.7×8.0 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
- 5160 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) by 42.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) (99/100 vs 83/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) is a bit better (94/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) (96/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) (85/100 vs 67/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (65/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 83/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo iQOO Neo9 Pro (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.