Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro vs Vivo X200 Ultra
The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (2020) runs on the MediaTek Helio G70, while the Vivo X200 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads — 86/100 vs 35/100 (a 51-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X200 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo X200 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,092,340 vs 317,084); the Vivo X200 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro doesn't; the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro is noticeably lighter (207g vs 229g).
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 207g vs 229g
- Better portability (42/100 vs 34/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3092340 vs 317084
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 417
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10095 vs 1345
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 27/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (78/100 vs 43/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 37/100)
Comparing the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro vs the Vivo X200 Ultra, the Vivo X200 Ultra scores 51 points higher (86/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra leads (78/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (92/100 vs 27/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (89/100 vs 37/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (93/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro is a bit better (42/100 vs 34/100).
| Specification | Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro | Vivo X200 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G70 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 317084 | 3092340 | |
| Geekbench Single | 417 | 3100 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1345 | 10095 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 167 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10, HIOS 7.0 | Android 15 / OriginOS 5 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.9×77.2×9.2 mm | 163.1×76.8×8.7 mm | |
| Weight | 207 g | 229 g | |
| Launch price | — | $889 |
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X200 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X200 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:14 hrs, total 24:25 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
We compared Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro and Vivo X200 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X200 Ultra leads Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro by 89.7% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (92/100 vs 27/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (89/100 vs 37/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (93/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro is a bit better (42/100 vs 34/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro by 51 points (86/100 vs 35/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro and the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 35/100, the Vivo X200 Ultra — 86/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 43/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro or the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 27/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro over the Vivo X200 Ultra?
The Tecno Tecno Camon 16 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X200 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.